The Royal Moroccan Football Federation (FRMF) has been granted until 7 May to submit its defense before the Court of Arbitration for Sport (TAS) in the ongoing dispute surrounding the CAN 2025 final. This deadline marks the initial legal window for the FRMF to present its case following an appeal lodged by the Senegalese Football Federation (FSF) against both the FRMF and the Confédération Africaine de Football (CAF).
On 25 March, the TAS confirmed receipt of the FSF’s appeal, which challenges the CAF’s decision to uphold Senegal’s forfeit victory in the tournament final. Under arbitration rules, the appellant (FSF) had a 20-day window to file its appeal brief, followed by an equivalent period for the respondents (FRMF and CAF) to respond. However, the FSF’s request for a procedural suspension has delayed the establishment of a definitive timeline or hearing date.
Sources close to the FRMF reveal the federation is preparing a meticulously constructed legal dossier, built with precision and confidence in the arbitration process. Matthieu Reeb, TAS General Secretary, emphasized the court’s capability to handle such disputes fairly: «The TAS is fully equipped to resolve this matter with specialized and independent arbitrators. We understand the urgency for teams and fans awaiting a resolution, and we are committed to expediting the process while ensuring every party’s right to a fair hearing.»
key events leading to the legal battle
The dispute stems from Senegal’s protest during the 18 January final, when players left the pitch for 16 minutes under coach Pape Thiaw’s orders. This followed a controversial penalty awarded to Morocco in stoppage time, which ultimately led to Senegal’s forfeiture. The CAF Appeal Jury upheld this decision on 17 March, prompting the FSF to escalate the matter to the TAS.
The FSF’s appeal challenges the application of CAF competition regulations, articles 82 and 84, arguing procedural irregularities. Meanwhile, the FRMF maintains its position, asserting the legitimacy of the original outcome and the CAF’s rulings.
The upcoming weeks will be critical as the FRMF finalizes its defense, with the global football community closely monitoring the proceedings. The TAS’s decision could set a significant precedent for future African Cup of Nations disputes.
