International human rights experts have strongly criticized a recent legislative move in Mali that threatens fundamental political freedoms. A draft law abolishing key protections for political participation and a decree suspending party activities indefinitely have raised serious concerns about the country’s commitment to human rights obligations.
Violation of fundamental rights
In a joint statement, UN experts emphasized that these measures represent a direct violation of Mali’s international human rights commitments, particularly regarding freedom of association and expression. The decree, signed after a cabinet meeting, immediately suspends all political party activities, while the proposed law aims to overhaul the country’s political landscape.
Government’s rationale questioned
The Malian government has defended these actions by claiming they aim to reduce the proliferation of political parties. However, experts argue that legitimate electoral rules, including registration requirements based on past electoral performance, would be a more effective approach. Instead, the proposed law would impose substantial financial deposits for party registration and candidate participation, effectively restricting political engagement to economically privileged groups.
Consultations under scrutiny
While authorities claim these measures stem from national dialogues such as the 2021 National Refoundation Conference and April 2025 political party charter consultations, experts highlight a critical flaw: the current civic space suppression makes genuine consultation impossible. Opposition figures and independent journalists face risks of punishment for expressing dissent, creating an environment where meaningful dialogue cannot occur.
Several political parties boycotted the April 2025 consultations, fearing the process might be used to dissolve parties or restrict their activities. The cabinet also considered recommendations to extend the current transitional leadership without elections for another five-year term starting in 2025. Experts warn these proposals contradict both national and international commitments made by Malian authorities.
Call for international standards compliance
The draft law is now headed to the National Transitional Council, led by General Malick Diaw, for approval. Human rights experts have urged the council to reject the legislation outright, offering instead to assist in revising the proposal to ensure compliance with international rights standards.
Following the law’s adoption, political parties have announced plans for public demonstrations on May 3 and 4. However, they report violent disruptions by individuals allegedly supporting the transitional authorities. Additional protests are scheduled for May 9.
Experts stress that peaceful assembly is vital for democratic health, urging Malian authorities to respect this right fully and refrain from intimidation or repression that could endanger participants’ safety and rights.
About the experts:
The statement was issued by three distinguished UN human rights experts:
- Eduardo Gonzalez – Independent Expert on human rights in Mali
- Irene Khan – Special Rapporteur on freedom of opinion and expression
- Gina Romero – Special Rapporteur on freedom of peaceful assembly and association
Important note:
These experts serve in their personal capacity as part of the UN’s Special Procedures. They are independent from any government or organization and receive no compensation for their work. Their mandate involves investigating and monitoring human rights situations worldwide.
