In Cameroon, the duration of parliamentary sessions has sparked debate, with journalist Guibai Gatama questioning the National Assembly’s ability to fulfill its constitutional duties effectively. The current legislative calendar, limited to three annual sessions of 30 days each, raises concerns about the institution’s capacity to oversee government actions, pass laws, and represent citizens.
Guibai Gatama argues that the reality falls short of expectations. In practice, plenary sessions often last only about 15 days per session, totaling roughly a month and a half of actual legislative work annually. This, he contends, is inadequate given Cameroon’s pressing political, economic, and social challenges.
To highlight the disparity, he compares Cameroon’s parliamentary calendar with those of other African nations. Countries like Chad, Senegal, and Côte d’Ivoire hold sessions spanning eight to nine months per year, while Nigeria’s Parliament operates almost continuously. This contrast underscores the urgency for reform in Cameroon’s legislative framework.
Advocating for a longer parliamentary calendar
Guibai Gatama, founder of the newspaper L’Œil du Sahel, calls for an open debate on extending parliamentary sessions. He believes that a revised legislative calendar would enhance public oversight, improve the quality of lawmaking, and bridge the gap between institutions and citizens’ daily concerns. The journalist argues that Cameroon’s Assembly risks appearing detached from national realities, making reform essential for democratic accountability.
