Constitutional reform in DRC ignites political tensions and opposition backlash
The debate over amending the Constitution in the Democratic Republic of the Congo continues to ignite public discourse. On May 27, the National Assembly passed a bill setting the terms for a referendum. Since then, tensions have escalated between the ruling majority, which advocates a necessary institutional overhaul, and the opposition, which denounces what it calls a scheme to keep President Félix Tshisekedi in power.
A divided youth faces a major issue
Beyond the political rhetoric, a crucial question remains: what do Congolese youth, who make up the majority of the population, think about this proposal? Is it a historic opportunity to refound the nation, or a distraction from pressing social and security emergencies? In Kinshasa, many young people express contrasting views. Some see this reform project as a chance to rethink the country’s institutional foundations. Others, however, question the timing and priorities of the government amid persistent economic and security challenges.
Katumbi raises the tone: “a red line”
“The Constitution is not a shirt you change at will,” opposition figure Moïse Katumbi declared in response to the constitutional reform proposal. In his view, the government is crossing a red line.
Protests, national dialogue, governance, and the country’s political future: in an exclusive interview, Moïse Katumbi gives direct answers and challenges President Félix Tshisekedi on his intentions and the consequences of such a project for Congolese democracy.
Judicial offensive announced by the C64 coalition
On June 9 in Kinshasa, the C64 coalition, which brings together several opposition parties including that of Moïse Katumbi, plans to file a complaint against Félix Tshisekedi. It accuses the head of state of attempting to seize power by force. This initiative marks a new step in the escalation of political tensions, as the atmosphere remains particularly charged.
Asked about this move, legal expert Jonas Ngalamulume downplays its significance. In his view, it is primarily a symbolic act. While acknowledging that the complaint is part of the opposition’s political strategy, he stresses that its concrete legal effects could be limited. Nonetheless, it helps fuel public debate and increase pressure on institutions.
As positions harden on both sides, the constitutional reform question has moved beyond a simple legal framework to become a major political issue. Between reform ambitions and accusations of authoritarian drift, the institutional future of the DRC remains dependent on upcoming decisions and the reactions of the population.